MCNEIL ECONOMICS
Contact me here:
  • Home
  • About M.E.
  • Classes
    • Principles of Macroeconomics
    • Fundamentals of Economics >
      • ECON 2003 Advice from Students
    • Economic Development >
      • Peer Performance Review
    • Economics of Innovation
    • Quantitative Methods
    • Business Statistics
    • McGraw-Hill Connect
  • Economic Resources
    • Economics News Links
    • Economic Data
    • Economics News RSS Feeds
    • Economics Videos
  • Support
    • Student Support >
      • Appointments
      • Grade Issue
      • Professional Development Articles
    • Teacher Support
    • Class Success Survey
  • South Africa
    • Overview
    • South Africa Mailing List
    • Images 2017
    • South Africa Blog
  • Blog

    International Trade Peer Performance Review

    The goal of this review is for you to rank and comment on the performance of your teammates.  Please be completely open and candid as possible.  Specific names and survey responses are held in confidentiality.

    How would you rank the other members of your group based on their performance to date?

    5 - Outstanding - their contribution was significant and added the most value to the project
    4 - Good - their contribution was very useful
    3 - Acceptable - contributed some, but could have contributed much more
    2 - Marginal - their contribution added very little value to the overall project
    1 - No contribution whatsoever

    If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.

    Write their name and the ranking you think they deserve. If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.
    Write their name and the ranking you think they deserve. If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.
    Write their name and the ranking you think they deserve. If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.
    Provide a ranking of yourself and a brief explanation for why you deserve this ranking.
Submit
Powered by
✕