MCNEIL ECONOMICS
Contact me here:
Home
About M.E.
Classes
Principles of Macroeconomics
Fundamentals of Economics
>
ECON 2003 Advice from Students
Economic Development
>
Peer Performance Review
Economics of Innovation
Quantitative Methods
Business Statistics
McGraw-Hill Connect
Economic Resources
Economics News Links
Economic Data
Economics News RSS Feeds
Economics Videos
Support
Student Support
>
Appointments
Grade Issue
Professional Development Articles
Teacher Support
Class Success Survey
South Africa
Overview
South Africa Mailing List
Images 2017
South Africa Blog
Blog
International Trade
Peer Performance Review
The goal of this review is for you to rank and comment on the performance of your teammates. Please be completely open and candid as possible. Specific names and survey responses are held in confidentiality.
How would you rank the other members of your group based on their performance to date?
5 - Outstanding - their contribution was significant and added the most value to the project
4 - Good - their contribution was very useful
3 - Acceptable - contributed some, but could have contributed much more
2 - Marginal - their contribution added very little value to the overall project
1 - No contribution whatsoever
If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.
*
Indicates required field
Your Name
*
Name and Ranking of Teammate #1
*
Write their name and the ranking you think they deserve. If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.
Name and Ranking of Teammate #2
*
Write their name and the ranking you think they deserve. If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.
Name and Ranking of Teammate #3
*
Write their name and the ranking you think they deserve. If you select a ranking of 1 or 2, please provide an explanation.
Name and Ranking of Teammate #4
*
Provide a ranking of yourself and a brief explanation for why you deserve this ranking.
Submit
✕